|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
04/09/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
RODRIGUEZ, A. |
Afiliación : |
ANALIA VERONICA RODRIGUEZ PEREYRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Recomendaciones a tener en cuenta en el manejo sanitario en la recría de terneros. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2008 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Día de campo, INIA Tacuarembó, Unidad Experimental Glencoe, Setiembre, 2008. Alternativas de intensificación, especialización, diversificación y valorización de la ganadería ovina y bovina en basalto. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2008. |
Páginas : |
p. 25-26 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
La implementación de nuevas tecnologías para la recría, como puede significar el encierro de los animales en alguna etapa de su vida, trae aparejada una mayor probabilidad de aparición de problemas sanitarios, especialmente de enfermedades infecciosas, que pueden ser prevenidas fácilmente si se aplican correctas medidas de manejo y planes de vacunación adecuados. |
Thesagro : |
BASALTO; GANADERIA; SANIDAD ANIMAL; TERNERO. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4374/1/GLENCOE-2008SetGuia-de-actividad-Visita-guiada.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01081nam a2200169 a 4500 001 1020439 005 2018-09-04 008 2008 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, A. 245 $aRecomendaciones a tener en cuenta en el manejo sanitario en la recría de terneros. 260 $aIn: Día de campo, INIA Tacuarembó, Unidad Experimental Glencoe, Setiembre, 2008. Alternativas de intensificación, especialización, diversificación y valorización de la ganadería ovina y bovina en basalto. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA$c2008 300 $ap. 25-26 520 $aLa implementación de nuevas tecnologías para la recría, como puede significar el encierro de los animales en alguna etapa de su vida, trae aparejada una mayor probabilidad de aparición de problemas sanitarios, especialmente de enfermedades infecciosas, que pueden ser prevenidas fácilmente si se aplican correctas medidas de manejo y planes de vacunación adecuados. 650 $aBASALTO 650 $aGANADERIA 650 $aSANIDAD ANIMAL 650 $aTERNERO
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
22/07/2018 |
Actualizado : |
23/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
ZANINE, A.M.; RODRIGUEZ MOTTA, J.P.; FERREIRA, D.J.; DE SOUZA, A.L.; RIBEIRO, M.D.; GERON, L.J.V.; FAJARDO, M.; SPRUNK, M.; PINHO, R.M.A. |
Afiliación : |
A.M. ZANINE, Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA); JOSE PEDRO RODRIGUEZ MOTTA, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; D.J. FERREIRA, Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA); A.L. DE SOUZA, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso (UFMT); M.D. RIBEIRO, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG); L. J. V. GERON, Universidade Estadual do Mato Grosso; M. FAJARDO, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; M. SPRUNK, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; R. M. A. PINHO, Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA). |
Título : |
Milk performance and grazing behaviour of dairy cows in response to pasture allowance. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 749-756. |
DOI : |
10.1071/AN17513 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Submitted: 26 July 2017 /Accepted: 15 February 2018 / Published online: 14 May 2018. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of pasture allowances on forage production, milk yield and composition, and grazing behaviour of Holstein cows during autumn. Thirty-six Holstein cows calving in the autumn were allocated to blocks considering: calving date, bodyweight, and body score. Treatments consisted of three pasture allowances as follows: high (HA; 38.4 kg DM/cow.day), medium (MA; 30.3 kg DM/cow.day), and low (LA; 26.8 kg DM/cow.day) pasture allowances. Forage mass and forage height pre-grazing were similar (P > 0.05) for all grazing targets. Pasture-use efficiency was affected (P < 0.05) by the pasture allowance. The highest and lowest efficiency was obtained with treatments LA and HA, respectively. The neutral detergent fibre content of forage harvesting was affected (P < 0.05) by the pasture allowance, with average of 44.8, 47.0, and 49.4 to HA, MA, and LA, respectively. There was an effect of pasture allowances (P < 0.05) on the milk yield per hectare and milk yield per cow. The highest production was observed in LA (438 L/ha.day) and the lowest in HA (314 L/ha.day). The percentage of milk fat, milk protein, and milk fat (g/cow.day) did not differ (P > 0.05) among pasture allowances. There was effect (P < 0.05) of pasture allowance with higher grazing time (369 min) and lower rumination time (23.3 min) observed to HA. Pasture allowances affected (P < 0.05) the total number of bites/day and bites/min, but did not affect (P > 0.05) bite mass. The pasture managements with low (26.8 kg DM/cow.day) pasture allowances provided better conditions for milk yield per area, likely due to the better grazing efficiency. However, pasture allowance provide little measurable changes on grazing behaviour.
@CSIRO MenosABSTRACT.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of pasture allowances on forage production, milk yield and composition, and grazing behaviour of Holstein cows during autumn. Thirty-six Holstein cows calving in the autumn were allocated to blocks considering: calving date, bodyweight, and body score. Treatments consisted of three pasture allowances as follows: high (HA; 38.4 kg DM/cow.day), medium (MA; 30.3 kg DM/cow.day), and low (LA; 26.8 kg DM/cow.day) pasture allowances. Forage mass and forage height pre-grazing were similar (P > 0.05) for all grazing targets. Pasture-use efficiency was affected (P < 0.05) by the pasture allowance. The highest and lowest efficiency was obtained with treatments LA and HA, respectively. The neutral detergent fibre content of forage harvesting was affected (P < 0.05) by the pasture allowance, with average of 44.8, 47.0, and 49.4 to HA, MA, and LA, respectively. There was an effect of pasture allowances (P < 0.05) on the milk yield per hectare and milk yield per cow. The highest production was observed in LA (438 L/ha.day) and the lowest in HA (314 L/ha.day). The percentage of milk fat, milk protein, and milk fat (g/cow.day) did not differ (P > 0.05) among pasture allowances. There was effect (P < 0.05) of pasture allowance with higher grazing time (369 min) and lower rumination time (23.3 min) observed to HA. Pasture allowances affected (P < 0.05) the total number of bites/day and bites/min, but did not affect (P > 0.05) bite mass. The pa... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
FODDER CROPS; GRAZING MANAGEMENT; MILK PRODUCTION; PASTURE UTILISATION. |
Thesagro : |
LECHERÍA; MANEJO DE PASTURAS; PRODUCCION DE LECHE. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 02780naa a2200325 a 4500 001 1058829 005 2019-10-23 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1071/AN17513$2DOI 100 1 $aZANINE, A.M. 245 $aMilk performance and grazing behaviour of dairy cows in response to pasture allowance.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 500 $aArticle history: Submitted: 26 July 2017 /Accepted: 15 February 2018 / Published online: 14 May 2018. 520 $aABSTRACT. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of pasture allowances on forage production, milk yield and composition, and grazing behaviour of Holstein cows during autumn. Thirty-six Holstein cows calving in the autumn were allocated to blocks considering: calving date, bodyweight, and body score. Treatments consisted of three pasture allowances as follows: high (HA; 38.4 kg DM/cow.day), medium (MA; 30.3 kg DM/cow.day), and low (LA; 26.8 kg DM/cow.day) pasture allowances. Forage mass and forage height pre-grazing were similar (P > 0.05) for all grazing targets. Pasture-use efficiency was affected (P < 0.05) by the pasture allowance. The highest and lowest efficiency was obtained with treatments LA and HA, respectively. The neutral detergent fibre content of forage harvesting was affected (P < 0.05) by the pasture allowance, with average of 44.8, 47.0, and 49.4 to HA, MA, and LA, respectively. There was an effect of pasture allowances (P < 0.05) on the milk yield per hectare and milk yield per cow. The highest production was observed in LA (438 L/ha.day) and the lowest in HA (314 L/ha.day). The percentage of milk fat, milk protein, and milk fat (g/cow.day) did not differ (P > 0.05) among pasture allowances. There was effect (P < 0.05) of pasture allowance with higher grazing time (369 min) and lower rumination time (23.3 min) observed to HA. Pasture allowances affected (P < 0.05) the total number of bites/day and bites/min, but did not affect (P > 0.05) bite mass. The pasture managements with low (26.8 kg DM/cow.day) pasture allowances provided better conditions for milk yield per area, likely due to the better grazing efficiency. However, pasture allowance provide little measurable changes on grazing behaviour. @CSIRO 650 $aLECHERÍA 650 $aMANEJO DE PASTURAS 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LECHE 653 $aFODDER CROPS 653 $aGRAZING MANAGEMENT 653 $aMILK PRODUCTION 653 $aPASTURE UTILISATION 700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ MOTTA, J.P. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, D.J. 700 1 $aDE SOUZA, A.L. 700 1 $aRIBEIRO, M.D. 700 1 $aGERON, L.J.V. 700 1 $aFAJARDO, M. 700 1 $aSPRUNK, M. 700 1 $aPINHO, R.M.A. 773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 749-756.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|